Miranda warnings: constitutional right vs. “prophylactic rule”
Miranda warnings: constitutional right vs. “prophylactic rule”
Focusing on three principles can produce a better outcome
Relying on the latest research study to support a use of force tactic is risky
Without such a process, blame and overreaction can leave many problems lying in wait
From an organizational culture perspective, the legal duty to intercede must be far more expansive
Whether use of force is legally justified in a given situation is not the only consideration
When evaluating incidents, it’s valuable to ask, “Who escalated the situation, and why?”
If you do not find the root cause of the issue, it’s all too easy for the bad event to happen again
Video evidence can expose officer dishonesty, creating a duty to disclose
Implicit bias, legitimacy and procedural justice apply as much to managing our own agencies as they do to our relationship with the community
Learning from the stories behind the headlines is essential to reducing real risk at our police agencies.
An understanding of both concepts is needed to properly explain use of deadly force to the public