There’s a sound reason behind 30-minute checks and a solid policy requiring them
There’s a sound reason behind 30-minute checks and a solid policy requiring them
The appellate court considered what the officer involved might have been thinking at the time he issued the citations
This case illustrates that not all lawsuits filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 allege a violation of the Fourth Amendment
As the appellate court noted, this does not seem to be a hard case
An officer is “not required to wait and hope for the best”
His vulgar speech was protected by the First Amendment as a matter of clearly established law
“Police officers owe judges candor when seeking search warrants”
Court: The warrant here is not an exemplar of grammatical precision, and no reading of it is free from ambiguity”
Knowing the rules about traffic stops and following them leads to an unhappy ending for Reyes
The Fourth Amendment does not restrict private citizens
“The plainly obvious consequences of the decision to rehire him would be that he would abuse inmates again”
This case provides an unusual opportunity for you to decide what should happen