This is an example of the challenge faced in suing a government agency under a Monell claim
This is an example of the challenge faced in suing a government agency under a Monell claim
An “isolated or sporadic incident” usually will not lead to liability under Monell
This case is a great illustration of Rule 404(b) and what it means for cops
The court’s very lengthy opinion is a nice review of the frisk doctrine
There was probable cause to enter and a fair probability the devices contained evidence
The trial court granted Bass’s request and the appellate court imposed an emergency stay.
The trial court turned him down for compassionate release and the appellate court affirmed
The fact that Coleman’s suspicious behavior was on school grounds “would immediately heighten a reasonable officer’s concern”
The appellate court held a reasonable jury could find it was “standard procedure” for the officers to temporarily seize Torcivia’s guns
The lesson of this case reminds me of an old maxim from Verbal Judo, “If it feels good, it’s no good.”
The officers effectively balanced their investigatory mission with tactical considerations
“The regulation is valid if it is reasonably related to legitimate penological interests”