The appellate court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion
The appellate court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion
“A suspect’s guilty conscience does not turn every police encounter into a custodial interrogation”
The Supreme Court vacated the court of appeals decision
“The flight of a suspected misdemeanant does not always justify a warrantless entry into a home.”
When the officer stopped him, Carswell was obliged to give up his home address
The trial court properly excluded the pre-Miranda statements
Impounds must be justified by a “reasonable, non-pretextual community-caretaking rationale”
To successfully sue an agency for inadequate training, a plaintiff must establish four factors
The deputy needed only reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to extend the traffic stop
Slowing down and following policy led to admission of the drugs
In so many situations, officers would benefit from slowing down
The appellate court held the controlled buys were reliable indicators