The officer performed what the court described as “the old highway patrol ‘two-step’”
The officer performed what the court described as “the old highway patrol ‘two-step’”
A reasonable officer could believe the driver and passenger were in a “common enterprise” to possess the fentanyl
The appellate court held the detention was not supported by reasonable suspicion
The trial court applied the proper legal analysis to the very complicated question of the First Amendment impact
The court held that “protesting innocence is not a get-out-of-pretrial-detention-free card”
The appellate court rejected Urbina-Rodriguez’s claim that the only reasonable explanation for having the rifle on hand was his concern for the poultry
Qualified immunity is meant to protect “all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law”
The suspect claimed the officer did not have reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop
This logic may well be followed by other courts applying Jones’ trespass analysis to an array of Fourth Amendment questions
Courts apply the Pickering test to determine whether a government employer infringed on an officer’s First Amendment free expression rights
Several federal circuit courts of appeal have upheld the right to record police carrying out their official duties in public
It is well-established law that a person can lawfully flip the bird at an officer