The due process rights of an officer placed on a Brady list are unclear
The due process rights of an officer placed on a Brady list are unclear
The court predicated its analysis on the Fourth Amendment balancing test
The court held there was ample reasonable suspicion to conduct the visual body cavity search
Numerous courts have held a strip search of a prison visitor is allowed only if it can be justified by a legitimate security concern
Qualified immunity is proper when the court resolves one of two factors in favor of the defendant officer
The appellate court held “this tableau is redolent of probable cause.”
The appellate court held the officer was not entitled to qualified immunity
“The grossly disproportionate force used in this case was clearly established as a constitutional violation”
The court must balance the officer’s safety interests against the pet owner’s possessory interests
Because the guard was not a government actor, the court ruled the Fourth Amendment did not apply to the detention and search
The “Terry frisk” doctrine is a very limited and narrow exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement
An agency must have policy and training on the duty to intervene