Factors from Graham v. Connor applied to King v. City of Rockford
Factors from Graham v. Connor applied to King v. City of Rockford
The appellate court began by citing other cases in which the court “held that it’s reasonable for officers to tase fleeing suspects”
No doubt, hindsight in this case is indeed 20-20
Patience is a virtue, and especially so when it is tactically smart
No matter what you call it, an aggressive person in crisis requires a careful response
So, what is the court’s message for the officer on the street?
The court held the officers “had no reasonable basis to believe that Reed posed a threat to safety”
The time is far past for agencies to provide the best training in how to intervene for a positive outcome
“At a minimum, it was a necessarily quick decision in a gray area where officers are protected by qualified immunity”
The court held, “Johnson’s Eighth Amendment claim flunks these standards”
“The Court emphasizes that this is an extremely close call”
A right is “clearly established” when it is based on a sufficiently clear foundation in then-existing precedent