In this case, officers were the plaintiffs
In this case, officers were the plaintiffs
The unanimous court opinion cited numerous similar decisions from other state and federal courts
The court found all these factors weighed against the reasonableness of impounding Ramos’ truck.
The appellate court held the stop and ensuing search were lawful
There was sufficient evidence for the officers to determine that Thomas had a serious medical need
Patience is a virtue, and especially so when it is tactically smart
“Handcuffing a well-behaved, unarmed, 83-year-old woman who complied with police direction may violate standards of societal decorum”
The Triple I check took only “a minute or two”
He claimed the medical staff acted as agents for the police
The answer involves a complicated intersection of First Amendment rights and a patient’s right to privacy
Betts argued the trooper lacked reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop
It didn’t really work out so well for him