The reasonable suspicion standard applies only to searches of parolees or probationers conducted by parole and probation agents
The reasonable suspicion standard applies only to searches of parolees or probationers conducted by parole and probation agents
Every case holds several “could have, should have, would have” lessons
Officers are always free to attempt voluntary conversations with passengers
A “determination that reasonable suspicion exists need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct”
A dissenting judge quipped that reasonable suspicion is a “low hump” to get over
Montalvo-Flores had a subjective expectation of privacy in the rental car
The court held the officers “had no reasonable basis to believe that Reed posed a threat to safety”
Court: “We first hold that Bailey’s Facebook post is constitutionally protected speech”
What might have avoided suppression?
“It is hard to imagine a clearer instance of consent through words and actions”
“A police officer is not entitled to arbitrarily breach these agreements.”
“The officers’ actions did not convert the valid Terry stop into an arrest”